Saturday, July 29, 2006

Breaking News - IPC 406/506/384/312 against Lee's Wife's family Members

Advocate Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, Supreme Court Laywer proved his Creditibility once again , by continous fighting Last two Years the case of LEE and today Delhi Court Judge had been convienced to issue the warent against LEE's father- in -law, Mother-in-Law, Sister-in-law and beloved Child Killer Wife for Crminal Breach of trust, Threathing to Kill, Criminal consperency and kill of unborn child without any intimation to husabnd.
Accused :-
1. Mr. P.S.Bag
2. Mrs. P.S.Bag
3. Ms. Sangeeta Bag
4. Mrs. Sushmita

Under IPCIPC 406/506/384/312 .

For all of you the case history of Lee for your ready reference:-

Is Lee done the Mistake by respecting the Anti Dowry LAW ??-1
http://www.indiatalking.com/blog/swarup/1234/
Is Lee done the Mistake by respecting the Anti Dowry LAW ??- 2
http://www.indiatalking.com/blog/swarup/1274/
Is Lee done the Mistake by respecting the Anti Dowry LAW ?? - Part -3 , Lee Fight Back !!
http://www.indiatalking.com/blog/swarup/1289/

When Judge asked to Lee " Instead of asking divorce why you want to send your wife to Jail , this may ruine your whole life ?"

Lee says , "Crime is crime and if my wife had done the crime she must go to jail and when she will return from the jail I will be the first person to receive her, but a child killer should not be allowed to move freely in the society. We had certain social responsibility and we can't be so selfish to hide the Crime for the shack of our own comfortable life."

Judge convienced after going thorugh all the Documents of Lee , like his Bank Statement, Her Sister-in-Law's own hand written letter, her wife's own hand written letter and Lee's Complin to Police Station, Human Rights, President of India, Prime Minister of India, Chief Minister of West Bengal..etc and subsequently Judge gone through all the Supreme Court Judgements and also refere the LAW BOOK and issued the Warent.

It seems as Ms Sobhe De say long back , Indina Men have to come to 21st Century instead of staying in 16th Century , some Indian Husabnd taken that very seriously.

"Crime Is Crime. Punishment should be irrespective of gender, religion and caste. Let us be honest and fight for truth"



Disclimer :This is totally writer personnel Views only. You may have different opinion. The name and place changed to protect the Persons Identity.

Coverage of the Story by ZEE News Team :
http://www.498a.org/contents/video/ZeeCrimeFiles_498a_Part4.mpeg


http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMDYvMDgvMTAjQXIwMDMwMw==&Mode=HTML&Locale=english-skin-custom

Publication:Times Of India Delhi;
Date:Aug 10, 2006;
Section:Times City;
Page Number:3

Man complains, wife summoned over abortion

TIMES NEWS NETWORK New Delhi: A Delhi court has summoned a woman for aborting her child on a complaint by her husband. Summoning Sushmita Sarkar, her father Pritisaran Bag, mother P S Bag and sister Sangeeta Bag on December 22, 2006, metropolitan magistrate Pritam Singh observed, ‘‘There are sufficient materials on record to summon the accused for the offences under 312 (causing miscarriage), 506 (criminal intimidation), 406 (criminal breach of trust), 384 (extortion) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy).’’

In a complaint filed through his counsel, Sushmita’s husband Swaroop Sarkar has accused her of marrying him only for extorting money and of causing miscarriage of their unborn baby. According to the complaint, Sarkar, a resident of Sarita Vihar in south Delhi and a textile technology engineer by qualification, married Sushmita in July 2002, after meeting her through an internet matrimonial service.

Sarkar has said that from the beginning, Sushmita taunted him over his meagre earnings and soon her parents started demanding money.

Sarkar has complained that Sushmita’s father threatened to get him ‘eliminated’ in Delhi if he did not cough up Rs 20 lakh.

In December, 2003, Sushmita went to Kolkata to attend the marriage of her sister while she was one-anda-half-month pregnant. On December 17, 2003, Sarkar received a call from his father-in-law, informing him of the miscarriage of their child, the complaint said.

Sarkar alleges that Sushmita said she would abort again if she got pregnant and that she wanted to marry her boyfriend. He has also accused his wife and inlaws of stealing jewellery worth Rs 3.6 lakh and Rs 35,000 in cash.

News From Hintustan times :-
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/artMailDisp.aspx?article=10_08_2006_004_038&typ=0&pub=47
Hindustan Times, New DelhiAugust 10, 2006Page - 4

Court summons woman over 'abortion'

A CITY court has responded to a man's complaintalleging that his wife had aborted their child after amarital dispute. Metropolitan Magistrate Pritam Singhhas summoned the woman Sushmita Sarkar, her parentsand sister to appear on December 22, 2006, statingthat there were sufficient materials on record to doso for offences under 312 (causing miscarriage), 506(criminal intimidation), 406(criminal breach oftrust), 384 (extortion) and 120-B (criminalconspiracy).

Sushmita's husband Swaroop Sarkar has accused her ofmarrying him only to extort money and of causingmiscarriage of their unborn baby.

Sarkar, a textile technology engineer and a resident of Sarita Vihar,married Sushmita in July, 2002 meeting her through aninternet matrimonial service.

He said Sushmita taunted him on his earnings and notbeing able to meet her requirements.Sarkar has complained that Sushmita's father being awell known lawyer in Kolkata had threatened to get him'eliminated' even in Delhi, as he has connection withunderworld, if he did not give them Rs 20 lakh.

InDecember, 2003, Sushmita went to Kolkata for her sister's marriage while she was one-and-a-half months pregnant. He later received a call of the miscarriage.

http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=196182

Court summons woman for aborting child
Express News Service
New Delhi, August 9: A DELHI court today summoned a woman for aborting her own child, on a complaint by her husband with whom she has a marital discord.
Summoning Sushmita Sarkar, her father Pritisaran Bag, her mother, and sister Sangeeta Bag to appear in court on December 22, later this year, Metropolitan Magistrate Pritam Singh observed, “There are sufficient materials on record to summon the accused for the offences under Sections 312 (causing miscarriage), 506 (criminal intimidation), 406(criminal breach of trust), 384 (extortion) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy).”
In a complaint filed through his counsel Mahesh Tiwari, Sushmita’s husband Swaroop Sarkar has accused her of marrying him only for extorting money and of causing miscarriage of their unborn baby.
According to the complaint, Sarkar, a resident of Sarita Vihar in south Delhi and a textile technology engineer by qualification, married Sushmita in July, 2002 meeting her through an Internet matrimonial service.
Right from the beginning, Sushmita had been taunting him for his meagre earnings and not being able to meet her requirements and her parents started demanding money, Sarkar alleged.
Sarkar complained that Sushmita’s father being a well-known lawyer in Kolkata had threatened to get him ‘eliminated’ in Delhi, “as he has connection with the underworld, or get him implicated in a false case, if he does not give them Rs 20 lakh.”

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home