Friday, November 10, 2006

Four Indian Women Behind the bar due to Ms. Renuka Choudhary’s “Diwali Gift ( DV Act).

Four Indian Women Behind the bar due to Ms. Renuka Choudhary’s “Diwali Gift ( DV Act).

Few days Back one of SIF member told me Swarup , “ Till date Indina Women had been protected by their Near and Dear ones. Now after this AK47 ( Domestic Violence Act ) , they will be protected by so called Protection Officer , Lawyers, Police , Judges..etc”

But She also asked me, “ Who will Protect Indian Women from those so called Protection Officers, Lawyers, Police , Judges ..etc”

“Following Shraddha's complaint, her husband Kachhru Vitthal Pingale
(26), mother-in-law Godabai (55), step mother-in-law Sarubai (50),
brother-in-law Vishwas ( 26) and sister -in-law Nisha (18) were arrested and two relatives, Sadanand alias Sadashiv Sukhdev Thorat (33) and his wife Vidya (28), booked by the police.”

In a single day , Ms. Renuka Choudhary’s “Diwali Gift ( DV Act) , ensure Four Women behind the bar without any investigation , who is right and who is wrong.

Another SIF Member Sachit explained: “If we go through the definition of the law and the explanations by all Women activist , this LAW to Protect the Women , DV Act is applicable ONLY AGAINST MEN, BUT HERE THE FOUR WOMEN TOO ARE ARRESTED!!!!!!” - NO DOWRY DEMAND ALLEGED.

“Nangre-Patil said it was "pure" case of domestic violence and there was no demand for dowry from the in-laws. Hence the suspects had been booked and arrested under the Domestic Violence Act.”


I conclude: Clearly proven that this "Domestic Violence Act" is AGAINST WOMEN.

MISUSE OF DV ACT HAS ALREADY STARTED – There is NO (alleged) DOWRY DEMAND, EVEN THEN THE FOUR WOMEN ARE ARRESTED . Just because a lady "ALLEGED HARRASMENT under Domestic Violence Act", TRUE OR FALSE that will be decided by honb'le court. But before that, these FOUR WOMEN will have to undergo ALL THIS TORTURE (Legal, Mental, Physical, Social, Economical) and best of all these FOUR women are 50, 54, 28 and 18 years old.

PS : Here I want to point out that the lady who is 18 yrs old might be thinking about her marriage etc and the ladies at 50 and 54 are elderly ladies (of the age of my mother).

Secondly : DV Act says (as far as I understand) that police doesn't have any power to take any action. The DV Act complaint has to be made with the honb'le megistrate, BUT HERE THE POLICE IS DOING WHATEVER THEY FEEL RIGHT !!!!!

I conclude : THIS LAW IS ANTI-WOMEN.– IT'S A FAMILY BREAKER. COZ EVEN before any investigations, THE WHOLE FAMILY GOT ARRESTED !!!!

May I ask you all, If in future, they (all the accused people) are found innocent during the trial in the honb'le court, then WHO IS GOING TO 'COMPENSATE' THIS TORTURE TO THE WHOLE FAMILY (?????)

I conclude : ONE LADY CAN MISUSE THIS LAW TO HARRAS ANOTHER FOUR LADIES – This DV Act is ANTI WOMEN (Example present here).

Who is GOING TO PUNISH THIS LADY (The Complainant) IF SHE IS FOUND TO BE FALSE ?. Is there any provision of PUNISHMENT for her in our Indian Laws?

Please notice the lines in the news item, "Nangre-Patil said it was "pure" case of domestic violence and there was no demand for dowry from the in-laws. Hence the suspects had been booked and arrested under the Domestic Violence Act. "
According to the news item, there is no dowry demand then how come the WHOLE FAMILY (INCLUDING FOUR LADIES) GOT ARRESTED UNDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT ALONE ?

Does any one have any answer, “ Who will Protect Indian Women from those so called Protection Officers, Lawyers, Police, Judges ..etc”

We want “Domestic Harmony Act ” equall Justice for all irrespective of Sex or caste , We say no to this AK47 in the form of “Domestic Violence Act” to do the Legal Terrorism.

With Regards
Swarup Sarkar


Reference:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/299979.cms

News Source : THE TIMES OF INDIAEmail of the editor :
toionlineeditor@indiatimes.co.in

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home