Friday, November 17, 2006

When Our Politician and LAW Maker Will Wake Up??

When Our Politician and LAW Maker Will Wake Up??

This is the appeal of Santhaka a SIF Volunter:-

News from IBN live:

http://www.ibnlive.com/news/act-wont-hit-good-hubbies-renuka/26051-3.html

In the above video2 this participant ruler of the country clearly knows 98% cases of IPC-498a (dowry law) i.e, 98% misuse of dowry laws.

What is 98% MISUSE by dowry law means?:

1) Every year atleast 50,000 families (out of 70,000 police FIRs on 498a) fornearly 15+ yrs (total 7 lkhs 50,000 families or around 0.5 crore persons)including intellectuals (5% intellectuals creates 60% infrastructure in mostcountries) who are responsible for the infrastructure of the country(likescientists, phds, engineers, doctors) wasted their precious time, value, moneyfor 5 to 8 yrs(minimum time it takes in any court for dowry law in india)declared as innocents by hight courts/supremecourts/session courts. These ppllost faith, trust on the executive system and governance of the country. Manyout of these ppl (very elders) depressed, died, diseased, lived in fear cursingat courts at old age before dying. how many children raised under singleparenting. See how the resources of the country wasted for nothing. who isresponsible for this? Is this the way country use/d intellectuals or resourcesfor the country? no one questions.
No one cares poor real suffering several women who not even inside this 100%498a cases.

Pls. see the real statistics here how many men die before marriage and howmany die after marriage:

http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1821/18210960.htm

It states that — “The distribution of suicides by marital status reveals someinteresting patterns. The rates do not vary much between the sexes for the nevermarried. Among those currently married, while the rate for males is about 17 per100,000 persons, the rate for females is 11.4 per 100,000. Among those widowed,while the rate for males is 21 per 100,000 persons, the rate for females is alsosignificantly lower, at 6.6 per 100,000. However, among divorced males thesuicide rate is 164 per 100,000 persons, but even in this class, among femalesthe rate is only 63 per 100,000. While the suicide rate for separated men isabout 167, for females it is only 41 per 100,000 persons. ”

National crime records bureau (NCRB) statistics about suicides:

http://ncrb.nic.in/ADSI-03.pdf
It states that - :
The ratio of Male : Female victims of suicide was 63 : 37.

Nearly 44.7% of the suicide victims were married males while only 25% weremarried females.”

Male Female accident Victim Ratio — 76 : 24.


http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=6109_0_1_0_M

Domestic Violence Rumor Mill Runs the United Nations
By David R. Usher on Nov 13, 06

If United States Ambassador John Bolton fails to act, world feministswill seize vast powers to destroy families internationally while committingtremendous human rights violations against men, women, and children in everycountry of the world.

Everyone agrees that domestic violence is a problem. Feminists dishonestlypretend it is entirely problem of unruly men, buttressed by unreliable myopicsurveys of women. The purpose of this feminist approach is to achieve theprimary goal of radical feminism: to destroy marriage, seize children and familywealth, and establish the liberated single-mother family. Unfounded allegationsof abuse are the political and legal vector already used in many westerncountries to achieve this end.

The senseless destruction of marriage, homes, families, and the lives ofchildren in western cultures has deeply violated the human rights of everyone.It has transformed many good cities into third-world urban disasters sufferingfrom rampant illegitimacy, prostitution, crime, child sexual predation, andpoverty. Radicals at the United Nations wish to force their new world order onthe rest of the world.
The truth is this: women are as likely, or even more likely than men to engagein, and initiate, domestic violence. According to a 32-nation by Murray Straus,female-only partner aggression is twice as prevalent as male-only partner abuse.
Many credible individuals now recognize this fact. They acknowledge the truth,and in many cases advocating strongly against the looming radical takeover ofthe United Nations. You can count on leaders and knowledgeable professionals(not driven by entitlements or political power) such as President Bush, PhyllisSchlafly, Dr. Gerald Koocher (President of the APA), Dr. Murray Straus, Dr. DonDutton, Wendy McElroy, Dr. Felicity Goodyear-Smith, and Lee Newman [SAFEInternational] to speak the truth.

Even a child could see through the rumor-mill-fed machinations of feminists.
Here are a few examples:


· The 113-page United Nations Report admits it is based on a “lack [of]systematic and reliable data on violence against women”. There is no evidencein the report that any information was collected about women’s violence againstmen. Without any supportive factual foundation, the U.N. Report claims that“Violence against women persists in every country in the world as a pervasiveviolation of human rights and a major impediment to achieving gender equality”.
· The U.N. Commission on Human Rights framework for model legislation ondomestic violence is a carte-blanche vehicle empowering feminists to violatescience and human rights in every country of the world. It defines domesticviolence solely as “gender-specific violence directed against women“, andadmonishes states to “adopt the broadest possible definitions of acts ofdomestic violence”. It states, “There shall be no restrictions on womenbringing suits against spouses or live-in partners”. The victim must be advised“of her rights as outlined below”. The responding officer must “arrange for theremoval of the offender from the home and, if that is not possible and if thevictim is in continuing danger, arrest the offender”. It permits immediateseizure of assets, and criminal conviction on the sole basis uncorroboratedtestimony by the alleged victim.

· WHO’s director Lee Jong-Wook made a stunning, scientifically-juxtaposed claimabout global domestic violence: “Women are more at risk from violence involvingpeople they know at home than from strangers in the street.”

· The World Bank estimates that “sexual and domestic violence accounts for 19per cent of the disease burden among women aged 15-44 in industrialisedcountries”. Do banks scientifically study domestic violence?

· A UNPF report alleges that two-thirds of married women in India were victimsof domestic violence, and then contradicts itself by claiming that 70 per centof married women in India between the age of 15 and 49 are victims of beating,rape or coerced sex. This report also asserts that the rate of domesticviolence is much higher in Egypt with 94 per cent and Zambia with 91 per cent.

· UNICEF makes a wild assertion based on a “study” done in conjunction with BodyShop International (a mail-order firm specializing in toiletries) “at least onein three women globally has been beaten, coerced into sex, or abused in someother way-most often by someone she knows, including by her husband or anothermale family member. Globally, one woman in four has been abused duringpregnancy.” If one-quarter of pregnant women are beaten, that leaves only 8%being beaten when they are not pregnant. The report spends much time discussingchildren living in situations of domestic violence, but fails to determinewhether domestic abuse by the mother or father is the cause of child problems.
Where do these dangerous claims come from? Non-Governmental Womensorganizations around the world generate volumes of narcissistic surveys aboutviolence. These are fed to feminists in the United Nations, whose re-sythesesare recited round-robin by NGO’s, creating vast illusions for predatorypolitical use.

Here are a few examples how the revolving feminist rumor mill works:

· Women’s activists in Russia claim that 50,000 Russian women are beaten everyhour. If this is true, every one of the 66,758,805 women in Russia would bebeaten every 13 days.

· The Texas Council on Family violence makes unfathomable claims based onnothing more than informal surveys of women: “Over 24,000 women from 15 sitesin 10 countries were interviewed for the World Health Organization’s study whichshowed that over 75 per cent of them were physically or sexually abused sincethe age of 15 and reported a partner as the culprit.”

· Based solely on self-generated “surveys” of women, feminist activists in Indiaclaim that 70% of women are abused, despite the fact that no credible scientificstudies have ever been undertaken to support the claim.

· The Feminist Majority cites World Health Organization (WHO) surveys of women,saying that “More than 25 percent of women said they had experienced moderate tosevere domestic violence in the last year. At six of the 15 sites, over 50percent of women had experienced a moderate to severe level of domesticviolence. The study found that rural Ethiopia had the highest rate of domesticviolence, with 71 percent of women experiencing violence in the home.
United Nations should be involved in ending domestic violence. The approachmust be realistic and scientifically appropriate on a country-by-country basis.Clearly, the ideological feminist approach will harm many women, men, andfamilies, and be dangerous to the world. The United States must not submit toforeign controls that lump it in the same category as Sudan.

We have nothing to fear but fear itself. Ambassador Bolton should testifyagainst acceptance of the Secretary General’s Report, and state why it isunacceptable. President Bush should send a message that the United States willnot support the United Nations at the present level of $5.3 billion annually,should it pursue a course of action that will clearly violate human rights inmost egalitarian countries of the world.


http://www.mediaradar.org/alert20061113.php

Fake Statistics Used to Claim that Wife-Beating is Men’s “Birthright”Throughout the world women in dating relationships are twice as likely as men tobe perpetrators of serious domestic violence. In India, for example, 23.0% ofsevere aggression was instigated by women, 15.3% was male-initiated, and 61.5%was mutual – see

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID41E2.pdf,

Table 3.But those facts didn’t stop The Washington Times (TWT) from publishing anarticle that completely ignored the problem of women who physically abuse men:http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20061113-120817-8603r.htm.It’s not just that the article is one-sided – it also makes inflammatory andderisive statements about men. The story quotes Brinda Karat of the All-IndiaDemocratic Women’s Association who claims that men “want to hold on to theirbirthright to beat up women.”
How can any responsible journalist include such a derogatory claim about anygroup in society?
The TWT article does mention the problem of false allegations by women. Butthat does not compensate for the fact that the article doesn’t give the exactsource of a key statistic.
The article claims, “A 2005 U.N. Population Fund report found that 70 percentof married women in India were victims of beatings or rape.” Somehow that numberseems a little hard to believe.

So RADAR did an extensive search of the UN Population Fund’s website. Nothingthere.

Then a Google search. No luck.


So RADAR finally contacted the UNDP Information Office. The UNDP employee wasunable to find a statement in any UNDP publication that even resembled thatstatistic.
Conclusion: The phony 70% figure was concocted by someone whose agenda wassomething other than reporting the truth.

Folks, we can’t let this inflammatory story pass unnoticed. The editors at theWashington Times need to hear from a boatload of upset readers. Please tell themthis message:
“The ‘Abused Wives in India’ article is biased, laced with anti-male rhetoric,and uses make-believe statistics. It ignores the well-documented fact that inIndia, women are twice as likely as men to engage in partner violence:

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID41E2.pdf.

The story is so systematically flawed that it resembles a propaganda piece. The Washington Times should promptlyretract this article and do a follow-up article that tells the truth about "domestic violence.”


We Want "Domestic Harmony LAW" , let stop this Legal Terrorism in the Name of " Domestic Violence LAW".

With regards

Swarup Sarkar


Disclimer :This is totally writer personnel Views only. You may have different opinion. The name and place changed to protect the Persons Identity.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home